Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Instagram
 

Amazing: Three U-Boats missing until 1985 when found in a U-boat bunker in Hamburg

Nick Knight

Because of the increasing intensity of air-raids, “Elbe II” was used for fitting out boats, new ones and those having happily returned. Two shifts were covered by 200 yard-workers, mostly Germans.  The last boats to enter “Elbe II” were also the most modern ones in the world – the type XXI-boats U-2505, U-3004 and U-3506 which had an estimated dive-depth of 400 m.

 

They had to undergo last works before setting to sea with the planned destination of Caribbean. U-2505 had already suffered bomb damage during an air-raid before, and also U-3004 suffered from a mishap during a test-dive.

EIbe_II_bunker_at_Hamburg
EIbe II bunker at Hamburg

Most of the crew members left between April 15th and 17th 1945 to fight, far away from the sea, against British troops in the Lueneburger Heide, not too far away. sources geschichtsspuren.de / uboat.net

Remaining crew prepared the self-destruction of the boats in the beginning of May. Meanwhile, the bunker-gates had already been destroyed during an air-raid on April 8th, and several hits had damaged the roof. In the evening of May 2nd the boats were filled with explosives like dynamite and depth charges. All mages www.geschichtsspuren.de

 

When hostilities ceased in 1945, the famous Elbe II Bunker fell to the British armies racing across the fatherland. source
When hostilities ceased in 1945, the famous Elbe II Bunker fell to the British armies racing across the fatherland.

 

On the 11th of November 1945, Royal Engineers from the British Army detonated several well placed sets of explosives (mainly discarded Luftwaffe ordinances) in an attempt to implode the whole complex. source
On the 11th of November 1945, Royal Engineers from the British Army detonated several well placed sets of explosives (mainly discarded Luftwaffe ordinances) in an attempt to implode the whole complex.

A fourth boat, the XXI-type U-2501, was lying with only its bow inside the shelter, as did the half completed VIIC boat U-684. The last boat to be sunk was U-2501 on May 3rd 1945.

The screw-less training boat broke in two close to the place where it had been built just one year ago at Blohm & Vossuboat.net . he British came and blew up the bunker and the roof partially collapsed, trapping the boats. Someone made an attempt to scrap them in the ’40s-’50s, but it was too dangerous, so they stayed somewhat intact until the ’90s.

The German govt. finally filled the bunker with gravel and concrete and buried the boats, then turned the area into a parking lot.  Thank God a bunch of those XXIs didn’t get loose during the war. It may have prolonged the slaughter until the atomic bomb could have been brought to bear against Germany.

They managed to get one on combat patrol right at the end, but were ordered to stop hostilities and they never launched an attack.

As a result of the collapsing wall, the pens’ roof collapsed crushing the Type XXI U-boat U-3506. Two additional boats, U-2505 and 3004, although sank by the incoming roof, survived the crash almost intact.
As a result of the collapsing wall, the pens’ roof collapsed crushing the Type XXI U-boat U-3506. Two additional boats, U-2505 and 3004, although sank by the incoming roof, survived the crash almost intact.
In 1949, the first official salvaged operation commenced. The three boats were pumped dry and stripped of their cells accumulators, copper wiring and diesel engines. U-2501, which had been sunk by the collapsing rooftop in May 1945, was raised and scrapped in the early 1950s. At the same time, the 2505 and 3004 boats were partially torn apart.
In 1949, the first official salvaged operation commenced. The three boats were pumped dry and stripped of their cells accumulators, copper wiring and diesel engines. U-2501, which had been sunk by the collapsing rooftop in May 1945, was raised and scrapped in the early 1950s. At the same time, the 2505 and 3004 boats were partially torn apart.

 

In the early years of the 1960s, attempts were made to clear the dislodge bunker area.source
In the early years of the 1960s, attempts were made to clear the dislodge bunker area.

 

Although some success was achieved during these clearing projects, the ever escalating cost of the program dampened further development. source
Although some success was achieved during these clearing projects, the ever escalating cost of the program dampened further development.
It was not until 1995 when the decision was made to permanently shutdown the pen area. source
It was not until 1995 when the decision was made to permanently shutdown the pen area.

These boats were virtually missing until 1985 when the boats were discovered through research by Jak P Mallmann-Showell, Wolfgang Hirschfeld and Walter Cloots in the mostly demolished Elbe II U-boat bunker in Hamburg. The Elbe II bunker is located on the southern bank of the Elbe river at the Vulkanhafen. The mid-1930s saw the Naval Construction Office in Berlin give the problem serious thought.

Various factions in the navy were convinced protection for the expanding U-boat arm was required.

An RAF raid on the capital in 1940 plus the occupation of France and Great Britain’s refusal to surrender was enough to trigger a massive building programme of submarine pens and air raid shelters.  By the autumn of 1940, construction of the “Elbe II” bunker in Hamburg and “Nordsee III” on the island of Heligoland was under way. Others swiftly followed.

The resulting explosions shocked the dividing wall between the two pens weakening it to the point that a few minutes after the main explosion, the complete wall collapsed and the structure’s roof partially caved in. source
The resulting explosions shocked the dividing wall between the two pens weakening it to the point that a few minutes after the main explosion, the complete wall collapsed and the structure’s roof partially caved in.

It was soon realised that such a massive project was beyond the Kriegsmarine, the Todt Organisation (OT) was brought in to oversee the administration of labour. The local supply of such items as sand, aggregate, cement and timber was often a cause for concern. The steel required was mostly imported from Germany. The attitudes of the people in France and Norway were significantly different.

In France there was generally no problem with the recruitment of men and the procurement of machinery and raw materials. It was a different story in Norway. There, the local population were far more reluctant to help the Germans. Indeed, most labour had to be brought in.

The ground selected for bunker construction was no help either: usually being at the head of a fjord, the foundations and footings had to be hewn out of granite. Several metres of silt also had to be overcome.

By October of that year, a survey found that the two U-boats (2505 and 3004) were completely submerge in a seas of sand and debris which they could not be salvage. source
By October of that year, a survey found that the two U-boats (2505 and 3004) were completely submerge in a seas of sand and debris which they could not be salvage.

 

As for the bunker structure itself, no serious effort was made to clear the debris. source
As for the bunker structure itself, no serious effort was made to clear the debris.

 

The cost associated to the program was cited as the reason to terminate the effort. source
The cost associated to the program was cited as the reason to terminate the effort.

The incessant air raids caused serious disruption to the project, hampering the supply of material, destroying machinery and harassing the workers. Machinery such as excavators, pile drivers, cranes, floodlighting and concrete pumps (which were still a relatively new technology in the 1940s) was temperamental, and in the case of steam-driven equipment, very noisy.

The end of hostilities in Europe also marked the end of the U-Bootwaffe’s hold on some of Europe’s most important naval bases. source
The end of hostilities in Europe also marked the end of the U-Bootwaffe’s hold on some of Europe’s most important naval bases.

 

There were rumours about a fourth boat traced in 1975, but this was never really confirmed. Since then only souvenir-hunters worked on the ghost-like, but remarkably well kept wrecks in their dark tombs, which became flooded with each tide and reappeared making strange sounds with the falling water all some hours, day after day. source
There were rumours about a fourth boat traced in 1975, but this was never really confirmed. Since then only souvenir-hunters worked on the ghost-like, but remarkably well kept wrecks in their dark tombs, which became flooded with each tide and reappeared making strange sounds with the falling water all some hours, day after day.

 

The area is within the freeport of Hamburg but in recent years the whole area has been filled over and the remains of the base and the trapped boats are now beneath a car park. source
The area is within the freeport of Hamburg but in recent years the whole area has been filled over and the remains of the base and the trapped boats are now beneath container docks.

Bunkers had to be able to accommodate more than just U-boats; space had to be found for offices, medical facilities, communications, lavatories, generators, ventilators, anti-aircraft guns, accommodation for key personnel such as crew-men, workshops, water purification plants, electrical equipment and radio testing facilities.

Storage space for spares, explosives, ammunition and oil was also required.

Untitled
Ariel view

There is no truth in the rumour of an underground bunker on Fuerteventura in the Canary Islands. This ‘story’ was gleaned from a similar situation in Le Havre in France when captured U-boat men were interrogated by the British.

Nick Knight

Nick Knight is one of the authors writing for The Vintage News