The Last Hangings of the Salem Witch Trials
On September 22, 1692, the Salem witch trials reached a tragic milestone as the last group of people accused of witchcraft were hanged in Salem, Massachusetts. This date marks the final chapter of a dark period in American history where fear and superstition led to the wrongful deaths of at least 25 individuals. The Salem witch trials are remembered as one of the most infamous episodes of mass hysteria in early American history.
On this day, eight people were executed: Martha Corey, Mary Easty, Alice Parker, Ann Pudeator, Margaret Scott, Wilmot Redd, Samuel Wardwell, and Mary Parker. These individuals were among those falsely accused of practicing witchcraft, a crime based more on fear and suspicion than on any solid evidence. The trials often relied on dubious “spectral evidence,” where accusations were supported by dreams and visions rather than concrete proof.
The Salem witch trials were marked by a growing sense of unease and public outcry. As more people questioned the fairness of the trials, including prominent members of the community, Governor William Phipps intervened in October 1692. He dissolved the Court of Oyer and Terminer, which had been conducting the trials, and later prohibited the use of spectral evidence. This intervention helped to bring an end to the trials and began a process of reflection and remorse.
More from us: Tituba: The Mysterious Enslaved Woman Whose Testimony Prompted the Salem Witch Trials
Would you like to see more daily historical content from The Vintage News? What if we sent it directly to your inbox every day? Sign up here to receive our daily Today in History posts.
The legacy of the Salem witch trials is a powerful reminder of the dangers of mass hysteria and the importance of fair judicial processes. Over time, the Massachusetts government issued apologies and reparations to the victims’ families, acknowledging the grave injustices that had occurred. Today, the Salem witch trials serve as a cautionary tale about the perils of fear-driven injustice and the need for reason and due process in the legal system.